Can Certain ‘Poor Carb’ Diets Raise Nonsmokers’ Cancer Of The Lung Risk

 

Are You at Risk for Lung Cancer?

Video taken from the channel: Pfizer


 

Sugar: The Unsweetened Truth and What We Can Do About It

Video taken from the channel: University of California Television (UCTV)


 

Prof. Grant Schofield “Lessons to change medicine’

Video taken from the channel: Low Carb Down Under


 

Carbs linked to lung cancer; even worse for you than red meat and dairy

Video taken from the channel: b/60


 

Sugary, starchy diet may raise lung cancer risk

Video taken from the channel: Physique TV


 

Refined Carbohydrates and Lung Cancer

Video taken from the channel: Roper St. Francis Healthcare


 

Study Shows Starchy, Sugary Diet May Raise Risk of Lung Cancer | NBC Nightly News

Video taken from the channel: NBC News


FRIDAY, March 4, 2016 (HealthDay News) Even people who’ve never smoked can get lung cancer, and a new study suggests their risk for the disease may rise if they eat a diet rich in certain. FRIDAY, March 4, 2016 (HealthDay News) Even people who’ve never smoked can get lung cancer, and a new study suggests their risk for the disease may rise if they eat a diet rich in certain carbohydrates.. These so-called “high glycemic index” diets regimens that trigger higher levels of insulin in the blood tend to be heavy in refined, “poor quality” carbs, one expert explained.

Even people who’ve never smoked can get lung cancer, and a new study suggests their risk for the disease may rise if they eat a diet rich in certain carbohydrates. FRIDAY, March 4, 2016 (HealthDay News) Even people who’ve never smoked can get lung cancer, and a new study suggests their risk for the disease may rise if they eat a diet rich in certain carbohydrates. These so-called “high glycemic index” diets regimens that trigger higher levels of insulin. Can Certain ‘Poor Carb’ Diets Raise Nonsmokers’ Lung Cancer Risk?

Study suggests link for regimens rich in refined carbs, potatoes, but it can’t prove cause-and-effect. Please note: This article was published more than one year ago. The facts and conclusions presented may have since changed and may no longer be accurate. No—Carbs Don’t Increase Risk of Lung Cancer A recent study looked at the correlation between carbs and lung cancer, and some news outlets went to town with their corresponding headlines.

For example, this news headline screamed: “Are carbs as bad as red meat and cigarettes when it. Foods with a high glycemic index meaning they raise your blood sugar the most are the ones associated with increased lung cancer risk. More than you might think. Research has shown that poor diet and not being active are key factors that can increase a person’s cancer risk.

The good news is that you can do something about this. Besides quitting smoking, some of the most important things you can do to help reduce your cancer risk ar. If you’re watching your weight, or just trying to eat healthy, you may think carbohydrates are off-limits. It’s true that too many calories from carbohydrates (carbs, for short) can lead to weight gain, obesity and increased risk for diseases, including certain types of cancer like breast and colon cancer.

And carbohydrates with a high glycemic index have been linked to increased lung cancer risk. Low-Carb Diets Like Keto Can Help You Lose Weight Now, But May Harm You Later. Recent studies show that low-carb diets may increase your risk of dying at a younger age.

Plant-based diets.

List of related literature:

In the committee’s judgment, any hypothetical increase in gastric cancer risk from high complex carbohydrate intake would be substantially less than the overall reduction in risk likely to occur with decreases in fat and nitrite intake and increases in vegetable and vitamin C consumption.

“Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk” by National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Commission on Life Sciences, Committee on Diet and Health
from Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk
by National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, et. al.
National Academies Press, 1989

Western highfat diets are associated with increased risk for colorectal cancer, while high-salt diets elevate the risk for gastric cancer.56–58 Obesity, in addition to the many other associated health concerns, also increases the risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma and colorectal cancer.

“Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Two Volume Set” by Hamid M. Said
from Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Two Volume Set
by Hamid M. Said
Elsevier Science, 2012

Overall, the evidence regarding total fat and lung cancer risk is somewhat inconsistent, with some studies indicating higher risk with higher intake levels, but other studies failing to observe any association.

“Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease” by Carol J. Boushey, Ann M. Coulston, Cheryl L. Rock, Elaine Monsen
from Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease
by Carol J. Boushey, Ann M. Coulston, et. al.
Elsevier Science, 2001

The latter statement is again simply not true, as the evidence presented earlier in this chapter makes clear: adequate control of T2DM, including the potential to put the disease into remission, can only be achieved with diets that limit carbohydrate intake to about 25 grams per day.

“Lore of Nutrition: Challenging conventional dietary beliefs” by Tim Noakes
from Lore of Nutrition: Challenging conventional dietary beliefs
by Tim Noakes
Penguin Random House South Africa, 2017

A high dietary glycemic index or load could increase the risk of pancreatic cancer due to the adverse effect of a high postprandial glucose level and resulting insulin demands.

“Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine 8” by Waun Ki Hong, Robert C. Bast Jr, American Association for Cancer Research, William Hait, Donald W. Kufe, James F. Holland, Emil Frei Iii
from Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine 8
by Waun Ki Hong, Robert C. Bast Jr, et. al.
People’s Medical Publishing House, 2010

The results showed no association between total carbohydrate intake and risk of colorectal adenoma (Oh et al., 2004) but did find an increased risk for colorectal cancer with higher carbohydrate intake (Higginbotham et al., 2004).

“Nutritional Oncology” by David Heber, George L. Blackburn, Vay Liang W. Go, John Milner
from Nutritional Oncology
by David Heber, George L. Blackburn, et. al.
Elsevier Science, 2011

The correct interpretation of this relative risk is that the incidence of high fat diets in the study population was six times greater among those with persons with lung cancer than those without lung cancer.

“Science Without Sense: The Risky Business of Public Health Research” by Steven J. Milloy, Cato Institute
from Science Without Sense: The Risky Business of Public Health Research
by Steven J. Milloy, Cato Institute
Cato Institute, 1995

A science-based strategy to lower the risk of cancer would be to keep your carb intake, and therefore insulin, low.

“Eat Rich, Live Long: Mastering the Low-Carb & Keto Spectrum for Weight Loss and Longevity” by Ivor Cummins, Jeffry Gerber
from Eat Rich, Live Long: Mastering the Low-Carb & Keto Spectrum for Weight Loss and Longevity
by Ivor Cummins, Jeffry Gerber
Victory Belt Publishing, 2018

This study found that dietary betacarotene intake was not associated with increased or decreased lung cancer risk in those who had never smoked, past or current smokers (Männistö et al 2004).

“Herbs and Natural Supplements Inkling: An Evidence-Based Guide” by Lesley Braun, Marc Cohen
from Herbs and Natural Supplements Inkling: An Evidence-Based Guide
by Lesley Braun, Marc Cohen
Elsevier Health Sciences APAC, 2010

However, the possibility that preclinical and clinically diagnosed lung cancer and concomitant changes in diet can lead to decreases in circulating micronutrient levels limits the inferences that

“Encyclopedia of Human Nutrition” by Benjamin Caballero, Lindsay Allen, Andrew Prentice
from Encyclopedia of Human Nutrition
by Benjamin Caballero, Lindsay Allen, Andrew Prentice
Elsevier Science, 2005

Oktay Kutluk

Kutluk Oktay, MD, FACOG is one of the world's foremost experts in fertility preservation as well as ovarian stimulation and in vitro fertilization for infertility treatments. He developed and performed the world's first ovarian transplantation procedures as well as pioneered new ovarian stimulation protocols for embryo and oocyte freezing for breast and endometrial cancer patients.

Mail: [email protected]
Telephone: +1 (877) 492-3666

Biography: https://medicine.yale.edu/profile/kutluk_oktay/
Bibliography: oktay_bibliography

View all posts

15 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • ‘Milk has a protective effect on oral health. Fat has a protective effect.’ Unprocessed milk has multiple effects against pathogens, and also contains beneficial bacteria known as probiotics.

    It is also interesting to note that butterfat, the fat in milk, is 10-20% MCFA, the type of fat that is readily converted into ketones.

  • muscle loss is hidden not noticed over time and muscles are the heaters of the body so they burn the calories of sugar
    including heart but aging causes Sarcopenia which literally means “lack of flesh.” It’s a condition of age-associated muscle degeneration that becomes more common in people over the 40 Sarcopenia is a type of muscle loss (muscle atrophy) that occurs with aging and/or immobility. It is characterized by the degenerative loss of skeletal muscle mass, quality, and strength. The rate of muscle loss is dependent on exercise level, co-morbidities, nutrition and other factors.

  • She kind of ruined alot of her argument for her when she said ” the epidemiology is clear ��” all carbs turn to sugar miss. Fruit is not heart healthy. What does that even fucking mean. Keeping carbs in control is just as important. Not saying dont eat them but high carb diets do the near same damage as sugar in your diet.

  • I am from UK, could not believe that the vending machine in the emergency unit [A &E in Britain ] was full of sugar filled with sodas, potato chips and candy. [ coke crisps and sweets ]

  • Limit ALL sugar, carbs and even fruits. Especially if you’re pre diabetic. Get a blood glucose meter and see how your body reacts.

  • We know refined foods are poison so why pussyfoot around just say that the human body cannot process this poison especially sugar, try living without refined carbs and fruit is ALSO sugar so don’t be fooled by the 5 a day rubbish!!!!!

  • unfortunately sugar is far too ingrained into the culture; its the happy cereal box; grandmas christmas treats, the soda at the drugstore. Yet it’s poison.

  • I know you won’t believe what I’m telling you so that’s why I made video. This has proof with paperwork that’s only 7min 45second. Hopefully you will look. They were experimenting in death camps! Phenol causes all auto immune disease’s I wouldn’t lie to you! Please look.

  • No we spend billions emitting currency into the economy on the basis of the prescription. The writing of prescriptions can not be stopped else the economy will collapse due the shortage of currency. You can opt out by finding your own services however your own ability to buy and sell is based upon the continued participation of your neighbors in the medical system.

    The information is readily available. If it is not being responded to there must be a causal factor that is not being considered.

  • The speaker needs to learn the difference between an inflection point and a local maximum. They are precisely defined mathematical terms and she has not used them correctly. ( 19:00)

  • A sociologist talking for over an hour telling us we’re victims and have no personal responsibility, while providing absolutely no research to show any negative effects from sugar consumption. She and Lustig should join forces.

  • The number one thing to do is to get the federal government to stop subsidizing sugar production. Until you can get that accomplished, any talk about adding taxes to sugar containing products is just blather.
    “In the United States, fewer than 4,500 farm businesses produce sugar. Yet they cost taxpayers up to $4 billion a year in subsidies. The U.S. sugar program is a Stalinist-style supply control initiative that limits imports through quotas and domestic production through what are called marketing allotments.”

  • Fructose is handled the same way as alcohol. Start fasted, eat a banana. Measure blood sugar every half hour. Start fasted again, eat a chocolate bar. Measure blood sugar every half hour. You will be amazed!

  • She doesn’t seem to understand that the
    tobacco industry added sugar to cigarettes
    to make them more addicting. The nicotine
    was always there.

  • 1:05:15
    “But it’s in grams, which is harder for people to calculate, it’s like 4.3 grams per teaspoon”
    9 teaspoons = 39 grams. There, I did it for you. Take the daily recommeded dose in grams and you’re set. (You may even round up to 40, that won’t kill you.)

    Freedom units are WEIRD.