The Primary Sex Teaching Programs Trained in Schools

 

Shocking Proof Of Graphic Sex Education To Be Apart Of School Curriculum

Video taken from the channel: RASTAFARIWAY PRO


 

Ontario Schools, Sex-Education curriculum exposed by Dr. Miriam Grossman [HD]

Video taken from the channel: Parental Awareness Organization


 

Being a Young Person: Comprehensive Sexuality Education

Video taken from the channel: UNESCO


 

Should Sex Education Be Taught in Schools?

Video taken from the channel: pokoleh


 

Should SEX EDUCATION be taught in school?

Video taken from the channel: Adelle Rose Evangelista


 

Shocking California sex education classes

Video taken from the channel: One America News Network


 

Should sex education be taught in school?

Video taken from the channel: Emily McDonnell


Comprehensive Sexuality Education is a program that starts in early childhood and continues through high school. 2  It brings up age-appropriate sexuality topics and covers the broad spectrum of sex education, including safe sex, sexually. On Tuesday’s radio program, Glenn Beck unveiled a series of leaked documents that show in shocking detail what schools throughout the country are putting into your children’s textbooks: the first revision to the sex education. In the state of Delaware, schools must teach 30 hours of health and family life education in every grade from Kindergarten to fourth grade.This increases to 35 hours in 5th and 6th grade.

In. Another option, provided by the Alliance for Healthy Youth, is the sex education program RSVP, which stands for “Responsible Social Values Program.”. RSVP is an abstinence-only-until-marriage sex education program geared toward middle school children. Sex has now become the main topic of every conversation from the start of the school day to the end. Boys make lewd and demeaning comments and it’s treated like no big deal, after all —.

There are three main sex education curricula employed in the United States: Abstinence-Only, Abstinence-Plus, and Comprehensive curricula. “Abstinence-Only” and Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage. Students seen in a high school classroom. | Reuters/Stephane Mahe. Parents are being urged to protect their children from sexualization and gender confusion by way of graphic sex education curricula in public schools.

Scholars and activists say parents must find out what their children are being taught and equip themselves to combat such programs. 23 rows · Apr 01, 2020 · Why Is Sexual Education Taught in Schools? A 2017 Centers for Disease.

Sex education, or “sex ed,” has always been a hot-button issue among conservative parents, but a recent post on the Good Men Project challenges all parents to start “demanding” better sex-ed classes in schools and gives 8 reasons why it should happen. But schools should be teaching programs. What is being taught as sex ed to California school children ironically cannot be spoken on television or radio.

The curriculum changes stem from the 2015 Healthy Youth Act (AB 329) by Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, which was sold as “updating the HIV and AIDS prevention education.

List of related literature:

Common sex education lessons include basic sexual anatomy, the changes to be expected during puberty, and biological information about pregnancy and birth.

“The SAGE Encyclopedia of Psychology and Gender” by Kevin L. Nadal
from The SAGE Encyclopedia of Psychology and Gender
by Kevin L. Nadal
SAGE Publications, 2017

Sex education and sexual socialization: Roles for educators and parents.

“Our Sexuality” by Robert L. Crooks, Karla Baur, Laura Widman
from Our Sexuality
by Robert L. Crooks, Karla Baur, Laura Widman
Cengage Learning, 2020

In addition to these notes, six model lessons for sex education in primary schools have been produced by the health education adviser.

“Sex Education: Rationale and Reaction” by Rex S. Rogers, Rogers
from Sex Education: Rationale and Reaction
by Rex S. Rogers, Rogers
Cambridge University Press, 1974

Since the 1970s, generalized sex education courses have been implemented by the states with trained specialists within school health services at the secondary level.

“Women's Lives around the World: A Global Encyclopedia [4 volumes]” by Susan M. Shaw, Nancy Staton Barbour, Patti Duncan Ph.D., Kryn Freehling-Burton, Jane Nichols
from Women’s Lives around the World: A Global Encyclopedia [4 volumes]
by Susan M. Shaw, Nancy Staton Barbour, et. al.
ABC-CLIO, 2018

The extent of single-sex schooling varies from country to country around the world.

“Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics” by Frank K. Lester
from Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
by Frank K. Lester
Information Age Publishing, Incorporated, 2007

There are more informal sources of sex education that are often used, such as magazines like Bravo and radio shows.

“International encyclopedia of adolescence: A-J, index” by Jeffrey Jensen Arnett
from International encyclopedia of adolescence: A-J, index
by Jeffrey Jensen Arnett
Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 2007

Although most public and parochial school sys­tems have organized sexual education programs, the curriculum varies considerably.

“Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics E-Book” by William B. Carey, Allen C. Crocker, Ellen Roy Elias, Heidi M. Feldman, William L. Coleman
from Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics E-Book
by William B. Carey, Allen C. Crocker, et. al.
Elsevier Health Sciences, 2009

taught for many years in single-sex schools and consults on the subject of gendered teaching to school systems, colleges, and universities.

“Teaching the Male Brain: How Boys Think, Feel, and Learn in School” by Abigail Norfleet James
from Teaching the Male Brain: How Boys Think, Feel, and Learn in School
by Abigail Norfleet James
SAGE Publications, 2015

Various other sex education books and articles, as well as training courses to provide a ‘scientific’ understanding and attitude toward sex among media workers and sex educators, also came out during that period.

“The Sexual History of the Global South: Sexual Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America” by Saskia Wieringa, Horacio Sívori
from The Sexual History of the Global South: Sexual Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America
by Saskia Wieringa, Horacio Sívori
Zed Books, 2013

Sex education courses are offered broadly, if not comprehensively, across the United States.

“The Critical Pedagogy Reader” by Antonia Darder, Marta Baltodano, Rodolfo D. Torres
from The Critical Pedagogy Reader
by Antonia Darder, Marta Baltodano, Rodolfo D. Torres
RoutledgeFalmer, 2003

Oktay Kutluk

Kutluk Oktay, MD, FACOG is one of the world's foremost experts in fertility preservation as well as ovarian stimulation and in vitro fertilization for infertility treatments. He developed and performed the world's first ovarian transplantation procedures as well as pioneered new ovarian stimulation protocols for embryo and oocyte freezing for breast and endometrial cancer patients.

Mail: [email protected]
Telephone: +1 (877) 492-3666

Biography: https://medicine.yale.edu/profile/kutluk_oktay/
Bibliography: oktay_bibliography

View all posts

8 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • I think schools should ask the student about they’re sexuality first so that they teach them the correct things for they’re sexuality

  • I’m sorry, but there is nothing wrong with a parent choosing when to
     teach and nurture their children to be prepared for the practice and
    subject  of sex, whether they are religious or not and to say there is,
    is to  deprive children of what should be a human right of developing a
    natural strong and close bond, understanding and nurturing from from
    their  mother and father. It is like saying you no longer think a parent
     deciding when their child should be taught to bathe themselves, learn
    to speak, learn to to eat, learn to use the toilet and much else that is
     natural and bonds families as they teach and nurture their children on
     these matters should be put in the hands of schools. People gain their
     most powerful lessons that lead to them learning about sex and the
     family from their families and parents or relationships their single
     parents have by observation as nature intends for them and other life
     forms to learn. Attacking religion for insisting a healthy process of
     nature for children and the family is not disrupted is lain wrong and
     dangerous. There is nothing we have made to replace nature that has
    ever compared to what nature has delivered for us naturally. What is
     shocking is that government school policies are being implemented to
     disrupt this natural process, encouraging children to grow up to no
     longer understand that the purpose of sex is to create children. To no
     longer understand that the reason one has sexual urges is that there
     body is getting ready to produce children. These truths should be
    common sense and the very pillars of learning about sex, and are what
    children are taught through natural process of the relation ships with
    their  parents and yet those who fight for children’s rights to maintain
    these  learning through natural process are being ridiculed as bigots,
    backward or un-progressive. It’s as stupid as ridiculing a parent for
    teaching  their child natural foods are more healthy for them than
    chocolates,  cakes and crisps and telling parents the school will teach
    the child  from the age of 4 or 5 crisps are more healthy than natural
    foods so a  fat child is not bullied and does not feel terrible being
    fat. It all  makes no sense. The most important thing is we teach
    children to love  and respect their brothers and sisters no matter what
    to stop bullying  and if they do we have failed. Children need not be
    stripped of their  rights to naturing and learning about natural life
    from their parents  and family which bonds them closer and raises their
    sense of trust and  understanding of family love and life. The idea
    human beings learning  most about the relationships that create and
    build loving homes for  children from their parents can be replaced by
    schools is a fraudulent  disgrace that like feeding children cakes
    everyday will have natural  long term repercussions on our societies.
    Sexual relationships are  taught by nature first through a child
    observation of their parents as  is the case with other human life and
    this process of natural learning  is being threatened by schools
    teaching children things that disrupt  nature’s process that intends to
    teach prepare children for the  understanding that children and families
    are produced by having sex and  the purpose of sex is to produce
    children. The fact we choose to  practice sex for other objectives
    should never let us or our children  stop understanding what sex really
    is for or we are a less intelligent  being. Peace and love

  • This needs to be called what it is ‘Should morally sick religiously motivated people be able to force their hatred and censorship on to schools? and try to brainwash pupils and give them a filtered version of the real world? ‘

    That”s the real question here?

  • As a 10 year old, I did not want to learn about Sex, I wanted to be a child! State Education destroyed my childhood innocence. Don’t let them destroy your children too. PIE are trying very hard to make a come back, they promoted child abuse back in the 70s here in the UK for 10 years. Thanks to Dr Judith Reisman, she stopped them. PIE is trying to make a big come back:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8466899/Paedophiles-rebrand-minor-attracted-persons-chilling-online-propaganda-drive.html
    Here is some History on Sex Education that parents need to know: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeJNk4W-o-c&t=141s

  • Please do a story on California schools and their choice of She Kills Monsters “school” play. The lead girl’s best friend is the Devil’s daughter and eventually declares she is gay and begins kissing the Devil’s daughter!!!! Please do a story on Leigh HS and Branham HS in San Jose, both which chose this play to push in our faces, minds, hearts, and soul. Thank you!

  • This is a ridiculous report. Teaching kids about sex and issues around sex in a judgement free way is key to producing health adults with healthy views on sex. Why on earth would you object to your child learning that masturbation is OK? Abstinence only sex ed has almost no impact on when youths have sex, it just ensures they don’t know about safe sex.

  • I’m sorry, but there is nothing wrong with a parent choosing when to
     teach and nurture their children to be prepared for the practice and
    subject  of sex, whether they are religious or not and to say there is,
    is to  deprive children of what should be a human right of developing a
    natural strong and close bond, understanding and nurturing from from
    their  mother and father. It is like saying you no longer think a parent
     deciding when their child should be taught to bathe themselves, learn
    to speak, learn to to eat, learn to use the toilet and much else that is
     natural and bonds families as they teach and nurture their children on
     these matters should be put in the hands of schools. People gain their
     most powerful lessons that lead to them learning about sex and the
     family from their families and parents or relationships their single
     parents have by observation as nature intends for them and other life
     forms to learn. Attacking religion for insisting a healthy process of
     nature for children and the family is not disrupted is lain wrong and
     dangerous. There is nothing we have made to replace nature that has
    ever compared to what nature has delivered for us naturally. What is
     shocking is that government school policies are being implemented to
     disrupt this natural process, encouraging children to grow up to no
     longer understand that the purpose of sex is to create children. To no
     longer understand that the reason one has sexual urges is that there
     body is getting ready to produce children. These truths should be
    common sense and the very pillars of learning about sex, and are what
    children are taught through natural process of the relation ships with
    their  parents and yet those who fight for children’s rights to maintain
    these  learning through natural process are being ridiculed as bigots,
    backward or un-progressive. It’s as stupid as ridiculing a parent for
    teaching  their child natural foods are more healthy for them than
    chocolates,  cakes and crisps and telling parents the school will teach
    the child  from the age of 4 or 5 crisps are more healthy than natural
    foods so a  fat child is not bullied and does not feel terrible being
    fat. It all  makes no sense. The most important thing is we teach
    children to love  and respect their brothers and sisters no matter what
    to stop bullying  and if they do we have failed. Children need not be
    stripped of their  rights to naturing and learning about natural life
    from their parents  and family which bonds them closer and raises their
    sense of trust and  understanding of family love and life. The idea
    human beings learning  most about the relationships that create and
    build loving homes for  children from their parents can be replaced by
    schools is a fraudulent  disgrace that like feeding children cakes
    everyday will have natural  long term repercussions on our societies.
    Sexual relationships are  taught by nature first through a child
    observation of their parents as  is the case with other human life and
    this process of natural learning  is being threatened by schools
    teaching children things that disrupt  nature’s process that intends to
    teach prepare children for the  understanding that children and families
    are produced by having sex and  the purpose of sex is to produce
    children. The fact we choose to  practice sex for other objectives
    should never let us or our children  stop understanding what sex really
    is for or we are a less intelligent  being. Peace and love

  • Before sex education at schools, they should fırst check out what they expose children on TV. Every single teenage tends to dress up like porn star in USA and UK and act like this. Where does this come from? What has happenned to 60s,70s etc love movies where people looked like more natural rather than porn star…